
What's all this about Watts, Volts, and Amps? Good question. Some info is here below, and more can be found at: But none of these links give a direct answer to the question. Be warned! A useful answer is going to be HUGE! (grin) So, see short version. Here's the extremely short answer... Conductive objects are always full of movable electric charges, and the overall motion of these charges is called an 'electric current.' Voltage can cause electric currents because a difference in voltage acts like a difference in pressure which pushes the conductors' own charges along. A conductor offers a certain amount of electrical resistance or "friction," and the friction against the flowing charges heats up the resistive object. The flowrate of the moving charges is measured in Amperes. The transfer of electrical energy (as well as the rate of heat output) is measured in Watts. The electrical resistance is measured in Ohms. Amperes, Volts, Watts, and Ohms.Not so simple? Then let's take a much deeper look. First the watts and amperes. Watts and amps are somewhat confusing because both are flowrates, yet we rarely talk about the "stuff" which does the flowing. I suspect it's impossible to understand a flow rate without first understanding the substance which flows. Take water flow for example. Could we really understand gallonspersecond, if we didn't understand gallons? And if we'd never touched water? It's not easy to understand flow rates like Amperes or Watts without understanding the "flowing material." OK, first let's do the Amperes. Since a current is a flow of charge, the common expression "flow of current" should be avoided, since literally it means "flow of flow of charge."
Current isn't a stuff. Electric currents are the flows of a stuff.
OK then, what's the name of the stuff that flows during an electric
current? The flowing stuff is called "Charge." 
AMPERESA quantity of charge is measured in units called COULOMBS, and the word Ampere means the same thing as "one Coulomb of charge flowing per second." If we were talking about water, then Coulombs would be like gallons, and amperage would be like gallonspersecond.What flows inside wires? It has several names:
If we'd never learned the word "gallon", and if we had no idea that water
even existed, how could we hope to understand "flow?" We might
decide that "current" was flowing through dry empty pipes. We might even
decide that "current" was an abstract concept. Or we might decide that
invisible wetness was moving along through the pipes. Or, we could
just give up on trying to understand plumbing at all. Instead we could
concentrate on the math, memorize equations. Do extremely well on any
physics test, but we wouldn't end up with any gutlevel understanding.
That's the problem with electricity and amperes.
We only can understand the electrical flow in wires (the amperes) if we
first understand the stuff that flows inside wires. What flows through
wires? It's the charge, it's the metal's own particlesea, the
Coulombs... CHARGE"Charge" is the stuff inside wires, but usually nobody tells us that
all metals are always jampacked full of movable charge. Always.
A hunk of
metal is like a tank full of water. Shake a metal block, and the "water"
swirls around inside. This "water" is the movable electric charge found
inside the metal. In our science classrooms we call this by the name
"electron sea," or even "electric fluid." This movable charge is part of
all metals. In fact it's part of all conductors, from plasma to battery
acid to charged dust storms. In copper metal, the electric fluid is
actually the outer electrons
of all the copper atoms. In any metal, the outer electrons do not orbit
the individual atoms. The electrons do not behave as 4th grade textbook
diagrams
usually depict atoms. Instead, the atoms' outer electrons drift around
inside the metal as a whole.
The movable chargestuff within a metal gives the metal its silvery
metallic color. We could even say that chargestuff is like a silver
liquid. At least it appears silvercolored when it's in metals. When
it's within some other materials, the movable charges don't usually look
silvery. "Silverylooking charges" applies to metals, but isn't a
hard and fast rule.
Note that this chargestuff is "uncharged", it is neutral. It's uncharged
charge! Is this even possible? Yes. On average, the charge inside a
metal is neutralized because each movable electron has a corresponding
proton within an atom nearby. Copper is made up
of free
electrons and
positive copper ions. Each electron is always fairly close to a
proton. The electric forcefields from the two opposite charges cancel
each other out. The overall charge is zero because equal quantities of
opposite polarity are both present. For every positive there is a
negative. But this doesn't mean that the chargestuff is gone. Even
though the average amount of charge inside a metal is cancelled out, we
can still cause one polarity of charge to move along while the other
polarity remains still. For this reason, an electrical current is a flow
of "uncharged" charges. Metal is made of negative electrons and positive
protons; it's like a positive sponge soaked with negative liquid. We can
make this "negative liquid" flow along.
ELECTRIC CURRENTWhenever the chargestuff within metals is forced to flow, we say that "electric currents" are created. The word "current" simply means "charge flow." We normally measure the flowing charges in terms of amperes.
The faster the chargestuff moves, the higher the amperage. Watch out
though, since amperes are not just the speed of the charges. The MORE
chargestuff that flows, (flows through a bigger wire for example,) the
higher the amperage. And a fast flow of charge through a narrow wire can
have the same amperes as a slow flow of charge through a bigger
wire. Double the speed of charges in a wire and you double the current.
Pinch a wire thinner, and the charges in the thin section flow faster, yet
the current stays the same. But if you keep the speed of a wire's charges
constant, and then increase the size of the wire, you also increase the
amperes.
Here's a way to visualize it. Bend a metal rod to form a ring, then weld
the ends together. Remember that all metals are full of "liquid" charge,
so the metal ring acts like a waterfilled loop of tubing. If you push a
magnet's pole into this ring, the magnetic forces will cause the
electronstuff within the whole ring to turn like a wheel (as if the ring
contained a movable drivebelt). By moving the magnet in and out of the
metal donut, we pump the donut's movable charges, and the charges flow in
a circle. That's essentially how electric generators work.
Electric generators are magnetdriven charge pumps. The changing magnetic
field pushes the wire's movable sea of charges, creating the amperes of
charge flow, but this can only occur when a closed ring or "complete
circuit" exists. Break the ring and you create a blockage, since the
charges can't easily escape the metal to jump across the break in the
ring. If the charges within the metal are like a drivebelt, then a gap
in the ring is like a "brake" that grabs the belt in one spot and stops
all belt motion. A complete metal ring is a "closed electric circuit,"
while a broken ring is an "open circuit."
A battery is another kind of charge pump. Cut a slot in our metal ring
and install a battery in the slot. This lets the battery pump the ring's
chargestuff in a circle. Batteries and generators are similar in that
both can pump charge through themselves and back out again. With a
battery installed in our metal ring, the battery draws charge into one end
and forces it out the other, and this makes the entire contents of the
metal ring start moving. Make another cut in the metal ring, install a
light bulb in the cut, and then the "friction" of the narrow light bulb
filament against the flowing chargestuff creates high temperatures, and
the wire filament inside the bulb glows whitehot. The battery drives the
ring of charge into motion, the charge moves along like a solid rubber
drive belt, and the light bulb "rubs" against the moving charge, which
makes the filament grow hot.
Important note: inside wires, usually the chargestuff flows extremely
slowly; slower than centimeters per minute. Amperes are an extremely
slow, circular flow. See
SPEED OF ELECTRICITY for info.
WATTSWatts have the same trouble as Amperes. "Watts" are the name of an electrical flow... but what stuff does the flowing? Energy! A "watt" is just a fancy way of saying "quantity of electrical energy flowing per second." But what is a quantity of electrical energy? I'll get to that in a sec. But briefly, any sort of energy is measured in terms of Joules. A joule of electrical energy can move from place to place along the wires. When you transport one joule of energy through a channel every second, the flowrate of energy is 1 Joule/Sec, and "one Joule per second" means "one watt." (It might help keep things traight if you erase all the "watts" in your textbook, and instead write "joules per second.)
What is power? The word "power" means "energy flow." In order to
understand these ideas, it might help if you avoid using the word "power"
at the start. The word "power" means "energy flow", so instead you can
practice thinking in terms of energyflow instead of in terms of the word
"power." Also think in terms of joulespersecond rather than watts,
and eventually
you'll gain a good understanding of the ideas behind them. Then, once you
know what you're talking about, you can start speaking in shorthand. To
use the shorthand, don't say "energy flow", say "power." And say "watts"
instead of "joules per second." But if you start out by saying "power"
and "watts", you might never really learn what these things are, because
you never really learned about the energy flow and the joules. FLOWING ELECTRICAL ENERGYOK, what then is electrical energy? It has another name: electromagnetism. Electrical energy is the same stuff as radio waves and light. It's made up of magnetic fields and electrostatic fields. A joule's worth of of radio waves is the same as a joule of electrical energy. But what does this have to do with understanding electric circuits? Quite a bit! I'll delve deeper into this. But first...
How is electric current different than energy flow? Let's take our
copper
ring again, the one with the battery and the light bulb. The battery
speeds up the ring of charge and makes it flow, while the light bulb keeps
it from speeding up too much. The battery also injects joules of
electrical energy into
the ring, and the light bulb takes them out again. Joules of energy flow
continuously between the battery and the bulb. The joules flow almost
instantly: at nearly the
speed of light, and if we stretch our ring until it's thousands of miles
long, the light bulb will still turn off immediately when the battery is
removed. (Well, not really immediately. There will still be some
joules left briefly
racing along the wires, so the bulb will stay lit for a tiny instant
, until all the energy arrives at the bulb.) Remove the battery, and the
light
bulb goes dark ALMOST instantly.
AMPERES ARE NOT A FLOW OF ENERGYNote that with the battery and bulb, the joules of energy flowed one way, down both wires. The battery created the electrical energy, and the light bulb consumed it. This was not a circular flow. The energy went from battery to bulb, and none returned. At the same time, the chargestuff flowed slowly in a circle within the entire ring. Two things were flowing at the same time through the one circuit. There you have the main difference between amperes and watts. The coulombs of charge are flowing slowly in a circle, while the joules of energy are flowing rapidly from an "energy source" to an "energy sink". Charge is like a rubber drive belt, and electrical energy is like the 'horsepower' sent between the distant parts of the belt. Amperes are slow and circular, while watts are fast and oneway. Amperes are a flow of copper charges, while watts are a nearlyinstant flow of electrical energy created by a battery or generator. For a better view of this topic, see WHERE DOES ENERGY FLOW IN CIRCUITS?
But what are Joules? That's where the
electromagnetism comes in. When
joules of energy are flying between the battery and the bulb, they are
made of invisible fields. The energy is partly made up of magnetic fields
surrounding the wires. It is also made from the electric fields which
extend between the two wires. Electricalmagnetic. Electromagnetic
fields. The joules of electrical energy are the same "stuff" as radio
waves. But in this case they're attached to the wires, and they flow
along the columns of movable electrons inside the wires. The joules of
electrical energy are a bit like sound waves which can flow along an air
hose. Yet at the same time, electrical energy is very different than
sound waves. The electrical energy flows in the space
around the wires, while the electric charge flows inside the wires.

VOLTSThere is a relationship between amperes and watts. They are not totally separate. To understand this, we need to add "voltage" to the mix. You've probably heard that voltage is like electrical pressure. What's usually not taught is that voltage is a major part of static electricity, so whenever we deal with voltage, we're dealing with static electricity. If I grab some electrons and pull them away from a wire, that wire will have excess protons left behind. If I place those electrons into another wire, then my two wires have oppositelyimbalanced charge. They have a voltage between them too, and a staticelectric field extends across the space between them. This fields *is* the voltage. Electrostatic fields are measured in terms of volts per distance, and if you have an electric field, you always have a voltage. To create voltage, take charges out of one object and stick them in another. You always do this when you scuff your shoes across the carpet in the wintertime. Batteries and generators do this all the time too. It's part of their "pumping" action. Voltage is an electrostatic concept, and a battery is a "static electric" device.
Remember the battery in the copper ring from above? The battery acted as a
charge pump. It pulled chargestuff out of one side of the ring, and
pushed it into the other side. Not only did this force the circle of
charges to begin moving, it also caused a voltagedifference to appear
between the two sides of the ring. It also caused an electrostatic field
to appear in the space surrounding the ring. The charges within the
copper ring began moving because they responded to the forces created by
the voltage surrounding the ring. In this way the voltage is like
pressure. By pushing the charges from one wire to the other, a voltage
causes the two wires to become positive and negative... and the positive
and negative wires produce a voltage. (In hydraulics we would use a
pressure to drive water into a pipe, and because we drove water into a
pipe the pressure in that pipe would rise.)
So, the battery "charged up" the two halves of the copper ring. The light
bulb provided a path to discharge them again, and this created the flow of
charge in the light bulb filament. The battery pushes charge through
itself, and this also forces a pressureimbalance in the ring, and forces
charges to flow through the light bulb filament. But where does energy fit
into this? To understand that, we also have to know about electrical
friction or "resistance."
Also: What is
Voltage?
OHMSImagine a pressurized water tank. Connect a narrow hose to it and open the valve. You'll get a certain flow of water because the hose is a certain size and length. Now the interesting part: make the hose twice as long, and the flow of water decreases by exactly two times. Makes sense? If we imagine the hose to have "friction", then by doubling its length, we double its friction. (The friction always doubles whether the water is flowing or not.) Make the hose longer and the water flows slower (fewer gallons per second,) make the hose shorter and the reduced friction lets the water flow faster (more gallons per second.)
Now suppose we connect a
very thin wire between the ends of a battery. The battery will supply its
pumping pressure (its "voltage"), and this will cause the chargestuff
inside the thin wire and the chargestuff within the battery to all start
moving. The charge flows in a complete circle. Double the length of the
wire, and you double the friction. The extra friction cuts the charge
flow (the amperes) in half. The friction is the "Ohms," it is the
electrical resistance. To alter the chargeflow in a circle of wire,
we can change the resistance of our piece of wire by changing its length.
Connect a long thin wire to a battery and the charge flow will be slow
(low amps.) Connect a shorter wire to the battery and the charge will be
faster (high amps.)
But we can also change the flow by changing the
pressure. Add another battery in series. This gives twice the
pressuredifference applied to the ends of the wire circle... which
doubles the flow. We've just discovered "Ohm's Law:" Ohm's law simply
says that the rate of charge flow is directly proportional to the pressure
difference, and if the pressure goes up, the flow goes up in proportion.
It also says that the resistance affects the charge flow. If the
resistance goes up while the pressuredifference stays the same, the flow
gets LESS by an "inverse" proportional amount. The harder you push, the
faster it flows. The bigger the resistance, the smaller the flow (if the
push is kept the same.) That's Ohm's law.
Whew. NOW we can get back to energy flow.
VOLTS, AMPS, OHMS, ENERGY FLOWLets go back to the copper ring with the battery and bulb. Suppose the battery grabs chargestuff out of one side of the ring and pushes it into the other. This makes charge start flowing around the whole circle, and also sends energy instantly from the battery to the light bulb. It takes a certain voltage to force the charges to flow at a certain rate, and the light bulb offers "friction" or resistance to the flow. All these things are related, but how? (Try bicycle wheel analogy.)
Here's the simplest electrical relation: THE HARDER THE PUSH, THE FASTER
THE FLOW. "Ohm's Law", can be written like this:
Note that coulombs per second is the same as "amperes." It says that a
large voltage causes coulombs of charge to flow faster
through a particular wire. But we usually think of current in terms of
amps, not
in terms of flowing charge. Here's the more common way to write Ohm's
law:
Voltage divided by resistance equals current. Make the voltage
twice as large, then the charges flow faster, and you get twice as much
current. Make the voltage less, and the current becomes less.
Ohm's law has another feature: THE MORE FRICTION YOU HAVE, THE SLOWER
THE FLOW. If you keep the voltage the same (in other words, you keep
using the same battery to power your light bulb), and if you double the
resistance, then the charges flow slower, and you get half as much
current. Increasing the resistance is easy: just hook more than one
light bulb in a series chain. The more light bulbs, the more
friction, which means that current is less and each bulb glows more dimly.
In the
bicycle wheel analogy mentioned above, a chain of light bulbs is like
several thumbs all rubbing on the same spinning tire. The more thumbs,
the slower the tire moves.
Here's a third way of looking at Ohm's law: WHEN A CONSTANT CURRENT
ENCOUNTERS FRICTION, A VOLTAGE APPEARS. We can rewrite Ohm's law to show
this:
If resistance stays the same, then the more current, the more volts you
get. Or, if the current is forced to stay the same and you increase the
friction, then more volts appear. Since most power supplies provide a
constant voltage rather than a constant current, the above equation is
used less often. Usually we already know the voltage applied to a device,
and we want to find the amperage. However, a current in a thin extension
cord causes loss of final voltage, and also transistor circuits involve
constant currents with changing voltages, so the above ideas are still
very useful.
But what about joules and watts? Whenever a certain amount of charge is
pushed through an electrical resistance, some electrical energy is lost
from the circuit and heat is created. A certain amount of energy flows
into the "frictional" resistor every second, and a certain amount of heat
energy flows back out again. If we increase the voltage, then for the
same hunk of charge being pushed through, more energy flows into the
resistor and gets converted to heat. If we increase the hunk of charge,
same thing: more heat flows out per second. Here's how to write this:
Charge flows slowly through the resistor and back out again. For every
coulomb of charge that's pulled slowly through the resistor, a certain
number of
joules of electrical energy race into the resistor and get
converted to heat.
The above equation isn't used very often. Instead, we usually think in
terms of charge flow and energy flow, not in terms of hunks of charge or
hunks of energy which move. However, thinking in terms of charge hunks or
energy hunks makes the concepts sensible. Once you grasp the "hunks"
concepts, once you know that energy is needed to push each hunk of charge
against a voltage force, afterwards we can rewrite things in terms of amps
and watts. Afterwards we can say that it takes a FLOW of energy (in
watts) to push a FLOW of charge (in amps) against a voltage. Yet first
it's important to understand the stuff that flows. Think in terms of
coulombs of charge and joules of energy.
The chargeflow and the energyflow are usually written as amps and watts.
This conceals the fact that some quantities of "stuff" are flowing. But
once
we understand what's really going on inside a circuit, it's simpler to
write amperes of chargeflow and watts of energyflow:
Don't forget that "Amps" is shorthand for the charge inside wires flowing
per second. And "watts" is shorthand for flowing energy. We can rewrite
the equation to make it look simpler. It's not really simpler. We've
just hidden the complexity of the above equation. It's shorthand. But
before using the shorthand, you'd better understand the fullblown
concept!
We can get the Ohms into the act too. Just combine this equation with
Ohm's law. Charge flow is caused by volts pushing against ohms, so let's
get rid of amps in the above equation and replace it with voltage and
ohms. This forms the equation below.
Notice: increasing the voltage will increase the energy flow that's
required, but it also increases the charge flow... which increases the
energy flow too! If voltage doubles, current doubles, and wattage doesn't
just double, instead the doubling doubles too (wattage goes up by four
times.)
Tripling the voltage makes the wattage go up by NINE times. Write it like
this:
So, if you double the voltage, energy flow increases by four, but if you
cut the friction in half while keeping voltage the same, energy flow goes
up by two, not four. (The amperes also change, but they're hidden.)
Here's one final equation. It's almost the same
as the one above, but voltage is hidden rather than ampereage:
So, the watts of energy flow will go up by four if you double the current.
But if you can somehow force the current to stay the same, then
when you double
the friction in the circuit, the energy flow will only double (and the
voltage will
change, but that part's hidden.)
And finally, here are a couple of things which can mess you up.
Think about flowing power. Try to visualize it. I hope you fail!
Remember... POWER DOESN'T FLOW! The word "power" means "flow of energy."
It's OK to imagine that invisible hunks of electrical energy are flowing
across a circuit. That's sensible. Electrical energy is like a stuff; it
can flow along, but "energy flow" cannot flow. Power is just flowing
energy, so "power" itself never flows. Beware, since many people (and
even textbooks) will talk about "flows of power." They are wrong. They should
be talking about flows of electrical energy. That drives home the fact
that energy can flow from place to place, and the flowrate is called
"power." "Flow of power" is a confusing, wrong, (and fundamentally
stupid) concept.
Guess what. The same books and people who talk about "flows of power"
will also talk about "flows of current." They'll try to convince you that
"current" is a stuff that can flow through wires. Ignore them, they're
wrong. Yes, elecric charge is like a stuff that exists inside all wires,
but
current isn't like that, current is different. When pumped by a battery
or a generator, the wire's
internal chargestuff starts flowing. We call the flow by the name "an
electrical current." But there is no such STUFF as "current." Current
cannot flow. (Ask yourself what flows in rivers, current... or water?
Can you go down to the creek and collect a bucket of "current?") If you
want a big shock, read through a textbook or an electronics magazine and
see how many times the phrase "current flow" appears. Like the phrase
"powerflow," it's not just wrong, it's STUPID. Authors are trying to
teach us about flows of charge, but instead they end up convincing us that
"current" is a kind of stuff! It's so weird. And it's a bit frightening
because it's so widespread. It's very rare to find a book which avoids
the phrase "current flow" and explain chargeflow. Most books instead
talk about this crazy flow of "current." It's been going on so long that
engineers speak of "current carriers" when they're talking about charge
carriers, and they use a law they call "conservation of current," when of
course current isn't conserved, only charge is conserved. So, it's no
wonder
that students
have trouble understanding electricity. They end up thinking that
waterpipes must be utterly different from circuits because you can fill a
glass with water, but who on earth can imagine filling a container with
"current?" Fortunately circuits really are like water pipes, and
its buckets of charge you want to discuss, not buckets full of
"current."
OK, I've run out of steam for now. Ooo! Ooo! No I haven't. I must now
go on a crusade about How Capacitors Are Explained Wrong.
Then I'll go on and on about
Why most explanations of transistors basically suck.
LINKS 