|
|
|
IN A SIMPLE CIRCUIT,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEE ALSO:
Poynting-flow diagrams are extremely rare in physics texts, and the
majority of physics instructors seem unaware that they exist. Perhaps the
reason is, that while still children, we were all taught that energy flows
inside the wires. These childhood science misconceptions are
extremely difficult to change. Our physics misconceptions frequently
remain unexamined, and often persist well into adulthood science and
engineering careers. For example, RP Feynman mentions the Poynting-flow
concept in "The Feynman Lectures," Chapter 27, and performs EM-field
energy flow analysis on capacitors and resistors. But then he doesn't
analyze 2-wire transmission lines, nor does he link all the components
together into a continuous system as with my figure 7 above. Worse, at
one point he angrily bad-mouths the whole concept, and insists that the
evidence shouldn't lead us to change our original viewpoint. Instead he
suggests that we continue to assume that the energy flows inside the
copper! This is Feynman?!! Counciling dishonesty rather than
harnessing an "alternate toolkit?" Amazing. (And ...doesn't he know
that the speed of light within solid copper, the speed which causes Skin
Effect phenomena, is down in the meters per second range? How then can
electrical energy cross the circuit so quickly?)
If the common misconception that "energy flows inside wires" has had such
a deleterious effect on an honest free-thinker like Feynman, imagine the
trouble a more conventional mind would have with it. No joke, I see this
as quite a frightening issue.
Here's another version of my figure 7: page 417, Fig 10-19, found in:This one above is interesting, because it shows one place where poynting vector energy flow is a crucial idea: Antenna Design! Kraus' Electromagnetics is essentially an antenna design book aimed at physics students. (But note that Kraus makes an important point: the source in the above diagrams ...is a battery! The propagating EM flow has 0Hz frequency.)
|