|
|
ELECTRONIC SURPLUS CATALOGS The Big List |
How Do Transistors Work?
NO, HOW DO THEY REALLY WORK?
Page 1, Page 2
La versión Español.
Short version
|
©1995 William Beaty, BSEE | |
Most introductory textbooks do a very poor job of explaining the details of how transistors work. First they assume that the Base current is somehow controlling the Collector current, then they try to explain how one current can affect another. These explanations always fail because Bipolar transistors, like FETs, are voltage-controlled devices. One current doesn't affect another. Instead, the Base-Emitter voltage controls the thickness of an insulating "depletion layer" which lies in the path of both the Base current and the larger Collector current. |
|||
|
When I first became interested in electronics as a kid, I sat down and
figured out how bipolar transistors work.
Well, sort of.
I read many articles which explained the "Common Base" amplifier.
Common-base is the setup which was used by the inventors of the
transistor. In those explanations, the Base is a grounded piece of
Germanium and the input signal is applied to the Emitter. Since
common-base amplifiers are rarely used in transistor circuitry, I ended up
having to dream up my own explanation. I based it upon the little bits I
already knew about the Common Emitter configuration. Common Emitter the
one where the Emitter is grounded, the Base is the input, and where the
output is taken across a resistor connected to the Collector. My
home-made explanation sort of worked, but I wasn't satisfied. I was full
of niggling doubts. And why the hell were the textbooks using Common Base
to introduce transistors to the newbies? It just didn't make any
sense.
When I went into engineering school, I found it extremely odd that there
were still no good explanations of bipolar transistors. Sure,
there
were detailed mathematical treatments. Just multiply the Base current by
"hfe" to obtain the Collector current. Or, treat the transistor as a
two-port network with a system of equations inside. Ebers-Moll
and all that. But these were similar to
black-box circuits, and none of them said HOW
a transistor works, how can a small current have any effect on a
larger one???? And nobody else seemed curious. Everyone else in
the class seemed to think that to memorize the equations was the same as
learning concepts and gaining understanding of the device. (R. Feynman calls this the
Euclidean or "Greek viewpoint;" the love of mathematics, as opposed to the
physicists'
"
Babylonian viewpoint" where concepts are far more important than equations.)
I'm a total Babylonian. For me, math is useless at the start, equations
are like those
black box Spice programs which might work great, but they don't tell you
any details of what's happening inside a device in the real world. First
tell me what "Transistor Action" is all about. Show me animated pictures,
use analogies. Only after I've attained a
visual and gut-level understanding of something, only then is the math
useful to me for refining it and adding all the details. However, math
alone is
not a genuine explanation. Math is just a tool or a recipe, a crutch for
those who want nothing except the final numerical result, and it certainly
does not confer expert knowledge. Now many years have passed and I think I see the problem... Traditional transistor explanations basically *suck.*The ones I see in textbooks and hobby magazines are terrible. They're full of errors and contradictions. They misuse the word "current" as if it were a substance that flows. They don't explain insulators properly. And they try to prove that the base current can have an effect on the collector current. And then there's all those authors who use Common-base amplifiers to introduce transistors to newbies. Are they just fools who follow a tradition only because it's traditional? Why don't they ever make efforts to improve the explanations? Were they written in stone by god? Well, if nobody but me thinks the explanation is open to improvements, then I'd better put my money where my mouth is. (And if I'm right, then it should be very easy to write a vastly improved explanation.)
Below are my ideas on how transistors really work. They're *not*
based on the traditional explanations found widely in engineering texts
and electronics magazines. Instead they're based on semiconductor physics
and the details behind the Ebers-Moll model. As you'll soon see, several
new concepts are required. It might be easier for you to just memorize
the equations rather than to imagine what really goes on inside. But if
you DO manage to decode my explanations and crude ASCII artwork, I think
you'll be in the elite minority who really understands transistors.
I've found that even most working engineers have no good mental picture of
bipolar transistor operation. So, if you attain a clear understanding of
transistors, you'll surpass many of the experts.
|
|||
|
First of all, you must abandon the idea that current travels in
transistors or flows inside of wires. Yes, you heard me right. Current does not
flow. Electric current never flows, since an electric current
is not a stuff. Electric current is a flow of something else. (Ask
yourself this: what's the stuff that flows
in a river, is it called "current?" Or is it called "water?")
The stuff that moves within wires is not named Electric Current. Intead
it is called Electric Charge. It's the charge that flows,
never the current. And in rivers or in plumbing, it's the water that
flows, not the "current." We cannot understand plumbing until we stop
believing in a magical stuff called "current." We must learn
that "water" flows inside of pipes. The
same is true with circuits. Wires are not full of current, they are full
of charges that can move. Electric charge is real stuff; it can move
around with a real velocity and a real direction. But electric current is
not stuff. If we decide to ignore
"current," and
then examine the behavior of moving charges in great detail, we can burn
off the clouds of fog that block our understanding of electronics.
Second: the charges found within conductors do not push themselves
along, but instead they're
pushed by potential difference; they're pushed by the voltage-fields
within the conductive material. Charges are not squirted out of the power supply
as if the power supply was some sort of water tank. If you imagine that
the charges leave through the positive or negative terminal of the power
supply; and if you think that the charges then spread throughout the
hollow pipes of the circuit, then you've made a fundamental
mistake. Wires do not act like "empty electron-pipes." A power
supply
does not supply any electrons. Power supplies certainly create
currents, or they cause currents,
but remember, we're removing that word "current." To create a flow of
charges, a power supply does not
inject any charges into the wires. The power supply is only a pump.
A pump can supply a pumping pressure. Pumps never supply the water
being pumped. Third: have you discovered the big 'secret' of visualizing electric circuits? ALL CONDUCTORS ARE ALREADY FULL OF CHARGEWires and silicon ...both behave like pre-filled water pipes or water tanks. Electric circuits are based on full pipes. This simple idea is usually obscured by the phrase "power supplies create current," or "current flows in wires." We end up thinking that wires are like hollow pipes. We end up thinking that a mysterious substance called Current is flowing through them. Nope. (Once we get rid of that word "current," we can discover fairly stunning insights into simple circuits, eh?)
If
circuits are like plumbing, then none of the "pipes" of a circuit are
ever empty. This idea is extremely important, and without it we cannot
understand semiconductors ...or even conductors.
Metals contain a vast quantity
of movable
electrons which forms a sort of "electric fluid" within the metal.
A simple block of copper is like a water tank!
Physicists call this fluid by the name "electron sea of metals."
Semiconductors are always full of
this movable "charge-stuff." The movable charge is there even when a
transistor is sitting on the
shelf and
disconnected from everything. When a voltage is applied across a piece of
silicon, those charges already within the material are driven
into motion. Also note that the charge within wires is ...uncharged.
Every movable electron has a positive proton nearby, so even though the
metal contains a vast sea of charge, there is no net charge on average.
Wires contain "uncharged" charge. Better call that "cancelled charge."
Yet even though the electrons are cancelled by the protons, the electrons
can still flow among the protons. Cancelled charge can still move around,
so it's possible to have flows of charge in uncharged metal.
OK, since the "pipes" are already full of "liquid," then in order to
understand
circuitry we
should NOT trace out the path starting at the terminals of the power
supply. Instead, we can start with any component on the schematic. If
a voltage is applied across that component, then the charges within
that component will start to flow. Let's modify the old "flashlight
explanation" which we all were taught in grade school. Here's the
corrected version:
AN ACCURATE FLASHLIGHT EXPLANATION:
The truth will set you free ...but first it will piss you off! -anon
Brief review: 1. THE STUFF THAT FLOWS THROUGH CONDUCTORS IS CALLED CHARGE. ("CURRENT" DOESN'T FLOW.)One last thing: The difference between a conductor and an insulator is simple: conductors are like pre-filled water pipes, while insulators are like pipes choked with ice. Both contain the "electric stuff;" conductors and insulators both are full of electrically charged particles. But the "stuff" inside an insulator can't move. When we apply a pressure-difference along a water pipe, the water flows. But with an empty pipe, there's nothing there, so the flow does not occur. And with an ice-choked pipe, the stuff is trapped and doesn't budge. (In other words, voltage causes charge-flow in conductors, but it can't cause charge-flow in insulators because the charges are immobilized.) Many intro textbooks get their definitions wrong. They define a conductor as something through which charges can flow, and insulators supposedly block charges. Nope. Air and vacuum don't block charges, yet air and vacuum are good insulators! In fact, a conductor is something that contains movable charges, while an insulator is something that lacks them. (If a book gets this foundational idea wrong, then most of its later explanations are like buildings built on a pile of garbage, and they will collapse.)
One more last thing before diving into transistors. Silicon is very different than metal. Metals are full of movable charges... but so is doped silicon. How are they different? Sure, there's that matter of the "band gap," and the difference between electrons versus holes, but that's not the important thing. The important difference is quite simple: metals have vast quantities of movable charge, but silicon does not. For example in copper, every single copper atom donates one movable electron to the "sea of charge." The "electric fluid" is very dense; just as dense as the copper metal. But in doped silicon, only one atom in a billion donates a movable charge. Silicon is like a big empty space with an occasional wandering charge. In silicon, you can sweep all the charges out of the material by using a few volts of potential, while in a metal it would take billions of volts to accomplish the same thing. Or in other words: 6. THE CHARGE INSIDE OF SEMICONDUCTORS IS LIKE A COMPRESSIBLE GAS, WHILE THE CHARGE INSIDE OF METALS IS LIKE A DENSE AND INCOMPRESSIBLE LIQUID.Sweeping away the charges in a material is the same as converting that material from a conductor to an insulator. If silicon is like a rubber hose, then it's a hose which contains compressible gas. We can easily squeeze it shut and stop the flow. But if copper is also like a rubber hose, then instead, it's like a hose full of iron slugs. You can squeeze and squeeze, but you can't smash them out of the way. But with air hoses and with silicon conductors, even a small sideways pressure can pinch the pathway shut and stop the flow.
OK, let's look at the way that transistors are usually explained.
To turn on an NPN transistor, a voltage is applied across the base and
emitter terminals. This causes electrons in the Base wire to move away
from the transistor itself and flow out towards the power supply. This in
turn pulls electrons out of the P-type base region, leaving 'holes'
behind, and the 'holes' act like positive charges which are pushed in the
opposite direction from the direction of electron current. What SEEMS to
happen is that the base wire injects positive charges into the base
region. It spews holes. It injects charge.
(Note that I'm describing charge flow here, not positive-charge
"conventional current.")
Remember: a conductor is not a substance which allows charges to
pass.
(Don't forget #3 above!) Actually a conductor is any substance
which
contains charges which are movable. Anything that lacks movable
charges
is an insulator. Inside the depletion layer, all the opposite charges
have fallen together and vanished. The gaps in the abacus beads are gone,
so no beads can move anymore. Lacking mobile charges, the silicon has
turned into an insulator. When there's no voltage applied across the
base/emitter terminals, this insulating layer grows fairly thick, and the
transistor acts like a switch which has been turned off.
I like to visualize that a transistor's silicon is normally like a
shiny
silver conductor (sort of like metal) ...except for this insulating layer
between the P and N regions which acts more like a layer of insulating
glass. Silicon is like a metal which can become glass!
See what's happening here? The transistor is not controlled by current. Instead it is controlled by the base/emitter voltage. 7. THE P-TYPE AND N-TYPE ARE CONDUCTORS BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN MOVABLE CHARGES.
|
______|______
| |
| COLLECTOR N |
|_____________|
| | ---->
| BASE P |______________
|=============| | + With a small voltage applied,
| | ____|____ the depletion layer gets thin,
| EMITTER N | _____ charges start crossing it,
|_____________| _________ and a small current appears.
| _____ The "switch" is only partly
|_____________________| - closed!
<-----
OK, on to PART TWO
PS Lilienfeld's patent numbers are:
These patents caused Bardeen, Brattain, and Shockley some grief, and caused the US Patent Office to disallow the Bell Labs FET patents in later years. Also:
It is possible to make a transistor using Galena (lead sulfide, PbS). Galena is often available from rock shops and science museum stores. You can even make your own by melting sulfur and lead powder over a flame. Look up keywords such as "cat's whisker diode" and "crystal radio" to find out more. The trick to making a transistor is to use a hyper-clean, freshly-cleaved crystal face, to sharpen your cat's-whisker contacts by dissolving the tips using electrolysis, and then to put the tips within 0.05mm of each other (or preferably within 0.01mm). Obviously the latter is the hardest part. Better use a microscope! The authors of the following article found that the base/emitter junction was critical: it HAD to act as a good rectifier. The base/collector junction wasn't as important. They got some power gain, but their beta was in the single digits. Others have mentioned that if you break open a 1N34 glass diode to expose the Germanium chip, you can make a crude transistor with a similar procedure. Old Germanium audio power transistors probably do the same, while giving much larger semiconductor area on which to play. Crystal Triode Action in Lead Sulphide, P. C. Banbury, H.A. Gebbie, C. A. Hogarth, pp78-86. SEMI-CONDUCTING MATERIALS, Conference proceedings, H.K. Henisch (ed), 1951 Butterworth's scientific publications LTD 1951.
|