DID TESLA'S WARDENCLYFFE TOWER
GENERATE SQUARE WAVES?
W. Beaty 2008
An Odd Relaxation Oscillator
Here's a "lost concept" which I noticed while reading lots of Tesla
material. Suppose we drive a Tesla coil using a low power RF
source which is weakly coupled? And the coil has very high "Q?" What
happens?
In that case the coil's RF output voltage will ramp up slowly, as if
the oscillating coil was a kind of "capacitor" being charged up. The
secondary coil is an energy storage component. But it's being charged up
with AC high frequency, not with DC! Doesn't this mean we can treat
our coil much
like a capacitor? We could discharge it with a very short spark-gap placed
across its terminals. If we keep driving it via loose coupling, the spark
gap should start firing slowly and periodically, since the
coil loses half or more of its stored energy each time it's shorted out by
the gap. It ramps up with AC oscillations, then sparks over. It
should go "snap-snap-snap-snap" just like a DC capacitor spark-gap system,
yet it's entirely AC.
Here's another odd concept. In the above AC device, suppose we place
a large capacitor in series with that spark gap. Let the discharge drive
a capacitor. What will happen?
Usually nothing strange. The high-freq AC signal just thinks the
capacitor looks like a good conductor. It's a short circuit, it's
invisible. However, if we can adjust the spark gap so it quenches
quickly, then whenever the gap fires, it will deposit a large DC potential
across our added capacitor. During the spark the oscillating coil dumps a
half-cycle, a DC surge. We've invented an 1890s AC-to-DC converter?
With no diode? Yes, but I'm just getting started!
The spark gap would have to quench fast; quench after a single
half-cycle of the RF ringing (or more easily done: quench after an odd
number of half-cycles.) In addition, during the next firing of the gap,
the capacitor DC polarity should reverse! After all, the gap fires
at maximum voltage, and with the capacitor previously charged, the
gap voltage
will be maximum when the instantaneous coil voltage is opposite to
the previous DC polarity left sitting on the capacitor by the previous
spark. It fires when the AC voltage happens to be backwards. So, during
each triggering of the gap, the capacitor polarity gets
reversed. As the spark gap slowly goes snap-snap-snap, the capacitor's
DC voltage goes pos-neg-pos-neg. And most important, the output voltage
might
not be too much smaller than the Tesla Coil's HV output. If we built a
multi-megavolt Tesla coil, we could use it to create slow, multi-megavolt
square waves.
So, by taking a conventional Tesla coil and adding a spark gap and a
H.T. capacitor to its output, perhaps we can STEP DOWN the coil's output
frequency to a very low value. We feed it high-freq AC, and it outputs
such a low frequency that Tesla might call it "electrostatic." Or, seen
from another angle: we've just built simple a sawtooth relaxation
oscillator, but it's a strange version where both the power supply and the
slow ramp is made of AC oscillations, and the output is a low-frequency
square wave rather than a sawtooth.
Where did this idea come from?
Well, think about it: Tesla wasn't working with "Tesla
Coils." He didn't call them that. To us, Tesla Coils are
vertical-coil lightning machines. But to him they were just one more
electrical
component among many he'd invented.
To him they were power
supplies.
For what would we use an AC high-voltage power supply? Well, if
you're
Tesla, you can hook it in series with a spark gap, then route the enormous
discharge current through a resonant circuit. That's right, use a Tesla
coil as the power supply for a Tesla coil. The two frequencies
need not be the same.
So what happens if we use a Tesla Coil as a power supply for a very
low-freq resonator: a long wave VLF spark transmitter? Tesla mentions the
parts of the process:
when an Extra coil is driven with CW, its oscillations ramp up over time,
and if its output is suddenly shorted by a spark gap, brief pulses of
stunning power are produced. Initially the TC secondary acts
like a slowly
charging "capacitor," then it gets periodically "discharged" by the
spark gap.
But unlike modern energy-storage caps, this "AC-storing capacitor" could
easily be
charged to megavolts, and most important: it could be recharged in tiny
fractions of a
second. It has enormous power-processing ability far beyond that of DC
energy storage capacitors.
So Tesla figured out a way to build a Tesla coil where the power supply
ran at megavolt output, and then the main Wardenclyffe coil stepped it up
from there. Aaaaaaand... the output frequency could be low.
But is this actually real? How about an experiment? OK, I'll take this
1" diameter long narrow 800KHz TC secondary and drive it at
resonance using my old Wavetek sig gen. It's now behaving like the Extra
Coil
of a Magnifier. The Wavetek puts out about 10Vp, and the far end of the
coil is running at a thousand volts at least. (NE-2 bulbs glow!)
Next I'll
let the extremely tiny sparks to leap from the coil to a metal object.
What happens? Something Very Cool!
A low frequency SQUARE WAVE does appear on the metal object. It's very
noisy and grungy. The cause is obvious:
- The 800KHz Extra-coil output rises to max volts over about ten cycles.
- the gap sparks over
- after quenching, some DC volts are left on the metal object
- the 800KHz HV ramps up again
- because there's now static HV on the metal object, this time the gap
fires on the OPPOSITE POLARITY of the 800KHz wave
- after quenching, opposite polarity of DC HV is left on the metal
object.
- repeat...
So it's bascially a relaxation oscillator much like a NE-2 blinker. But
this one is powered by AC, not DC. The slow-rising "sawtooth" waveform is
an 800KHz modulation rather than a DC ramp. And the output is alternating
positive and negative spikes. Wow! Pretty cool, eh?
OK, what if I harness those slow alternating spikes? I can use them
to drive a simple tank circuit. I grab an inductor and capacitor out of
the junk box and route the alternating spikes through it. Yes! A large
slow sine wave appears across this grounded LC tank. Also, the spark
gap's pulses seem to "phase lock" to the LC oscillations, and the signal
isn't nearly as grungy as before. On the scope it remains coherent over
more than 50 cycles. Makes sense: the slow AC voltage on the output of
the spark gap is affecting the gap timing, and it's forcing the gap to
fire at just the right time to dump a single-polarity pulse that kicks the
next cycle of the slow sine wave.
I look at the component values and find that my coil/capacitor tank
circuit runs at 39KHz. Those were randomly chosen components. I
calculate a better freq: the AC ramp takes about 10 cycles to rise, and
the pulses are half that period, so the ideal output freq would be...
40KHz?!!!!! But my RLC is 39KHz. Bizarre. Just by chance those random
component values were
perfect. I love it when that stuff happens. (If I'd grabbed different
ones ...would I have failed? and given up?)
So, I now have a BACKWARDS TESLA COIL. Its CW sine wave drive is
800KHz, and its output is 20x lower: 40KHz. And this step-down factor
depends on the Q of the Extra Coil. Instead if the Q-factor of my extra
coil had been 10x higher, and it took 100 cycles for it to ramp up or
down, then I could
have stepped the 800KHz down to 4KHz, which is well within the set of
Schumann absorption lines for Earth-res.
If Tesla had a 75KHz coil of very high Q, his spark gap PRF and his
transmitter output could have been far lower: down in the hundreds of Hz.
The output is an alternating spike waveform, and the "tank circuit" which
forms the sine wave is ...the entire Earth. As any oscillator will do, it
phase-locks its pulse drive to its tank circuit, where any changes to the
tank circuit's resonant frequency won't de-tune the drive. It will just
continue oscillating at the changed frequency. And so a simple Tesla coil
can excite the very low Earth Resonances even though the TC frequency is
tens or hundreds of times higher. (But note that this "Earth-res
phase-lock" effect would only occur above a certain threshold of operating
kilowatts. The returning sky-fields which are trapped in the Schumann
ionospheric duct, they must be strong enough to bias the next triggering
of the spark gap.)
Hmmmm now, did Tesla have any plans for a giant transmitter where
there was a large, CW-driven "Extra coil," but there was also an
unexplained mysterious "Extra Gap" placed in series with the HV output
conductor? Yes. Yes he did.
Regarding Tesla's transmitter at Wardenclyffe NJ, it's still an open
question about how he was able to use a tens-KHz system to drive the Earth
resonance frequencies (which are all below 20KHz, and the best ones far
lower.) To excite the Earth, a huge Tesla coil would have to have far
lower resonance than usual, and so be built 20x or 50x taller than the
largest ones ever made. Or, Tesla would have to have some way to step the
frequency down without reducing the enormous output voltage.
Perhaps he connected a spark gap in series with his coil's output,
then used this to charge a capacitor? Yes, according to unpatented
drawings from his collected works, this is exactly what he was working on
during Wardenclyffe years. But nobody has said why that "Extra Gap" was
placed between the main coil output and the capacitive topload hemisphere.
So maybe a mystery is solved, and the Wardenclyffe tower was the world's
largest square-wave signal generator?
SQUARE WAVES, AND PHASE-LOCK FEEDBACK TOO
Relaxation oscillators are sensitive to environmental e-fields. After
all, they're being triggered when the voltage across a spark gap reaches a
particular threshold. If other external e-fields are present, these extra
fields
can add or subtract from that threshold. They'll cause the oscillator's
pulses to come earlier or later than normal. (This is why a little NE-2
blinker circuit can detect nearby RF sources.)
If we set up Wardenclyffe to be a square wave oscillator, and then we
leave it outdoors where it can be influenced by other e-fields, perhaps
something very useful will happen. Perhaps the pulse-waves sent outwards
by our system will race all the way around the Earth, then concentrate
themselves in contracting ripples back at our location and cause our
oscillator to fire early.
If such things were to occur, what does it mean? It means that our
device will drive just one of the Earth Resonance frequencies. It means
that if the resonance were to slightly wander because of Solar Wind or
changing magnetosphere phenomena... our transmitter would still remain
locked to that frequency. The system would keep oscillating even as the
frequency drifted up and down. And if we attempted to set our transmitter
to
a much higher frequency, it would leap discontinuously to the
higher
absorption line in the Earth Resonance series. Remember that these
frequencies are all in the audio range. So if the spark gap distance was
made wider and wider, the noise from such a system
would sound like successive notes being struck on a piano keyboard. Or
perhaps sound like an air-raid siren which leaps from note to note. (Well,
they'd
actually be buzzing raspy, spark-gap notes!)
Brrrrrrrrrrr-Baaaaaaaaaaaa-BIIIIIIIIII-BEEEEEEEEEEN! That *may* have
been the characteristic sound of Wardenclyffe tower in operation.
This all solves another Tesla mystery: Earth Resonance frequencies are
known to wander around slowly. For this reason it's supposedly impossible
to strongly excite the Earth Resonances. If your VLF transmitter managed
to hit the target frequency, your success would only be temporary, since
the Earth system would slowly change, and you'd lose the resonance. The
solution is found above: stop treating the Earth as a target frequency for
your drive transmitter, but instead make it part of your oscillator. If
the Earth becomes our oscillator's "Tank Circuit," then such an oscillator
will always be on resonance, even if the frequency-determining components
are wandering in value.
Yes, except for my 800KHz coil test, all this stuff is pure speculation.
But it all hangs together SO NICELY, and explains so many mysteries, that
I thought I'd post the whole mess here on my website and let the critics
have at it.
|